The internet is full of reviews and comments, it just gets more confusing the more you read. So I guess I should post my points here and get a direct answer if possible. I hope this is the right forum to address this. I am thinking of upgrading my system and would it to be more musical but also good for action movies. Although it does everything OK but I would like to improve audio quality.

Anthem vs Rotel receiver

For Amps, I read that these 2 as the some of the most musical ones. I am also not sure if I should keep my Yamaha and plug in a better musical amp. So I can use both Amps for different things. Some have adviced that I either go for movies or audio, but I like having both. But I wouldn't use a receiver for these speakers if you want to achieve a full potential of these speakers performance wise.

I would get separates. FYI, I would stay away from Rotel av preamp processor or av receiver. If you want to do Atmos and need more channels you will need more than one RMB as this is a five-channel amp.

The Rotel RMB is an outstanding amplifier for the money. They are meant to be paired together. And again you will need more than one Sigma Amp5 power amp if you want to do Atmos. Compared to the s it will be a BIG step forward. Arcam is very musical. Anthem makes an excellent receiver and would be worth looking at and would be a fine choice.

If you can swing a Marantz Pre-Pro with a Rotel power amp, that will be spectacular. Classe is even better but the price goes up a lot and the setup is much harder. The reason I said to stay away from Rotel av receivers or pre pro is because its hdmi switching is very buggy. They sounded really good for music but have all kinds of issues related to its HDMI switching. The new and Rotel's flagship receiver the RAP sounded really good esp for music but if you can just steer clear of any Rotel or NAD receivers or av pre pro.

NAD is the same way.Deals Amazon deals Bargain threads Classified adverts. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. What's new New posts Latest activity. Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. DrGekko Well-known Member.

I wish to upgrade my current Onkyo AVR to something higher end for my 7. Ideally I would like opinions from past and present owners, especially about the Arcam as I appreciate the has only recently been launched.

I have no interest nor time in installing or setting up, I would leave this to an installer but I don't want to be altering anything afterwards either. So over to you experts out there to share your wisdom and recommendations. By all means, I'm open to hearing about other comparative brands, especially if I can save a bob or two! Imho, I would give the nod to Arcam because of Dirac. I currently have both and them and there is a difference, albeit a small one.

I like the sound of my system better with the Arcam, especially the center. I will say there is a big difference between them if the standard curves don't work for you. With ARC, you are very limited in adjustments crossovers, room gain, eq cutoff and it can't eq anything over 5khz.The internet is full of reviews and comments, it just gets more confusing the more you read.

So I guess I should post my points here and get a direct answer if possible. I hope this is the right forum to address this.

2019 Dolby Atmos / DTS:X AV Processor Comparison

I am thinking of upgrading my system and would it to be more musical but also good for action movies. Although it does everything OK but I would like to improve audio quality.

For Amps, I read that these 2 as the some of the most musical ones. I am also not sure if I should keep my Yamaha and plug in a better musical amp.

So I can use both Amps for different things. Some have adviced that I either go for movies or audio, but I like having both. But I wouldn't use a receiver for these speakers if you want to achieve a full potential of these speakers performance wise.

I would get separates. FYI, I would stay away from Rotel av preamp processor or av receiver. If you want to do Atmos and need more channels you will need more than one RMB as this is a five-channel amp.

The Rotel RMB is an outstanding amplifier for the money. They are meant to be paired together. And again you will need more than one Sigma Amp5 power amp if you want to do Atmos. Compared to the s it will be a BIG step forward.

Arcam is very musical. Anthem makes an excellent receiver and would be worth looking at and would be a fine choice. If you can swing a Marantz Pre-Pro with a Rotel power amp, that will be spectacular. Classe is even better but the price goes up a lot and the setup is much harder. The reason I said to stay away from Rotel av receivers or pre pro is because its hdmi switching is very buggy.

They sounded really good for music but have all kinds of issues related to its HDMI switching. The new and Rotel's flagship receiver the RAP sounded really good esp for music but if you can just steer clear of any Rotel or NAD receivers or av pre pro. NAD is the same way. They have the same problem as the Rotel. The same apply to av preamp processor products. So whatever you end up getting just stay away from Rotel or NAD receivers or av pre pro.

Classe sacrificed lot of unnecessary connectivities, connections and features in order to bring the cost down on the Sigma SSP. There's no legacy analog video connections, no multi-channel analog audio inputs 7.Deals Amazon deals Bargain threads Classified adverts.

Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. What's new New posts Latest activity. Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter brantuk Start date Mar 22, Tags anthem arcam decide please help.

It's a lotta dosh and I'm brain fried going through specs and talking to sales techs. I'm driving all 8ohm Kef R7 series speakers in 7. Can anyone advise which I should go for and if poss give me a few good tips or technical ideas as to why one might be a better choice than the other. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide me. Apone Member. Certainly both are good choices. DIRAC can make a massive difference to the system when set up properly.

Some of the dealers listed may also have the KEF R Series in the demo room for you to have a listen to with the Arcam kit.

With the outlay you are considering, you should must imo really hear the system on the speakers you have so that you can make an informed decision.

Thanks Apone - yes I upgraded the speakers first but in doing so it kinda showed up the weaknesses of the I'll keep looking to see if I can find a certified dealer with some Arcam demo gear already set up. Nice to know someone who's heard one of my choices with the Kefs.

arcam vs anthem vs rotel

Try here, you should be able to find someone close to you. Cinematic Excellence A whole new experience in home cinema sound On the subject of Anthem, I did have a play with the older Non Atmos kit and it was good as well. Both of your choices are good quality systems on paper, ultimately go with what sounds good to you.

Thanks again Apone - I found one in Nottingham using your link which is very convenient for me. Deleted member Guest. To maybe bring the cost down have a look at the anthem and a 7 channel power amp from a different manufacturer? Let the do 2 atmos speakers and the back surrounds? May I also suggest that running 3 subs of different models could be detrimental to the sound, and make it harder for room eq. Maybe a better idea to sell them and replace with two sealed subs from the same manufacturer?

Just a thought. Hi Steven and thanks for your suggestions. Is the Anthem better or similar in terms of sound quality than theor any way other than price. I would need an additional 4 channels to drive my 4 R50 Atmos upfirers. Is there a better manufacturer to consider? I agree my subwoofer arrangement isn't optimal I also have a BK XXLS lol I was hoping Arc or Dirac would sort out the best two of them but, yes it would make sense to use two of the same size.Find results that contain All of my search term words Any of my search term words Find results in I'm very happy with an Anthemwith 5 main channels driven via rca pre-outs by a power amp anthem mca Personally I think you have a great offer here from a store with a get out clause that would be hard to pass up!

And within budget if there's considering. Not sure anyone in Canberra where are that also sells if want to check out, and caveats to explore, eg will need spl meter to setup - no auto eq here, it won't be as user friendly as Japanese brands, also will need to check the speaker config will allow the 5. The Japanese brands do get more honest it would seem though as go up their chain but usually have to head upto flagship level or one removed to see that sort of thing.

I really like the rotel power amps. I haven't mentioned it because I doubt any of them will.

arcam vs anthem vs rotel

I owned the last one for some 8 years and the 4th gen is due around ! I know it's an older model but my parents had a Arcam AVR and it had the most backward menu structure I've ever experienced. They replaced it with a more upmarket NAD which isn't much better re weird menu operation but sound wise it was an improvement. They are only running 5.

I'll prolly get Marantz next flagship processor. I was going to get anbut it's getting long in the tooth now, best wait a tad longer. Wheres the shameless plug emoji!?

And how much does a FMJ P38 sell for? If the internal amps were assignable I'd definitely be thinking about this route. Thanks, Miranda is where I've been looking and the deal is what's prompting me to decide soon. Realistically, you will have a power requirement, but unless you actually know what that is you're kinda pissing in the dark. Will all or most speakers will be set to small and crossed over at 80Hz and crossed over to the subwoofer? If so your power requirements will be significantly reduced.Free Shipping on All Orders!

Contact Account Shopping Cart. October edited November in Electronics.

My unbiased review of ANTHEM VS NAD in terms of sound quality

I have been building my dream home theater for a long time. I have owned parasound amplifiers that i successfully used to power my home theater about 3 years ago. Later, i used a rotel RMB which i sold a few months back. Unfortunately, hard times came about and i was forced to sell off my equipment i am sure many of you have been there and started to slowly buy everything little by little once again.

I went from infinity speakers to definitive technology, polk audio lsi's, and currently monitor audio rx silver series. I always found myself trying to find that blend of speakers and amplification that didnt make me cringe when i cranked it up. I have been on a quest to locate that perfect blend of a preamp or receiver along with the right amplifier and speakers that make my music and home theater sound huge with an open soundstage and where i didnt have ear fatigue.

Fast forward to the present. I had the marantz sr receiver connected as a preamp to a rotel rmb pushing monitor audio rx6's. I felt the sound was thin, perhaps a bit on the bright side could be the audessey xt so i started to just use the marantz by itlsef and noticed a pretty good sound quality thought not extremely better so i felt that i didnt need to keep the rotel amp so i sold it. I had always wanted to try the NAD M25 because i had never heard anything bad about it. Everyone raved about its sound quality and finesse, but i couldnt afford it until the right deal came along and i finally bought it.

I drove 6 hours to meet up with the guy who had it and was getting rid of it but didnt have the shipping boxes and i didnt want him to ship it without the original boxes. At that point, i had already posted my marantz receiver for sale because i STILL felt it wasnt giving me the sound so many people raved about. I found it boomy EVEN after running audessey multiple times. I connected the NAD M25 and it sounded louder of course, but i just didnt hear a wow although perhaps most of you would have been impressed with the sound.

I considered emotiva umcanthem receivers, etc. I found a great deal on the anthem mrx that i coudlnt pass up. I knew it didnt have the power i desired but i didnt care because i was looking just for a processor anyhow so the power was irrelavant since i had the m25 to power things.

arcam vs anthem vs rotel

The mrx finally arrives last week and i decided to just give it a listen without using the m What i heard was astonishing to say the least I had gone on a looooong journey looking and looking for the right blend of power, neutrality, non fatiguing sound and if there is anyone here looking for that type of sound, please consider anything anthem.

I have spent 5 days just watching movies, listening to music, cranking this little mrx receiver and i simply cant get enough of it. I really thought the m25 would take things to a whole new level when connected to the anthem, but no guys. It simply amplified things and i felt it took away some of the detail the anthem receiver had on its own and i havent even ran the room correction because it sounds THAT GOOD Simply put, the anthem sound is STILL ahead of anything else i have ever heard.

It simply amplifies but it doesn't keep the clarity and spaciousness that anthem has. I thought i was crazy,but the truth is that i was in self denial and thought i must have been doing something wrong. Do yourself a favor, find a good deal on a used anthem receiver and call it a day.

I have living proof that you wont have to go big and powerful in order to be better than small and detailed. Forget about audessey, or all those 35 different surround modes most receivers give you.

If you are all about sound quality, have a room that isnt accoustically perfect or feel there is room for more improvement in your system, go the anthem route.I've seen this response many times on this forum and other places and many who would put the Emotiva right up there with them. Is there any reason why you put those two ahead of the Emotiva and why you wouldn't consider it?

I jumped onto the Emotiva bandwagon in That included purchasing a pair of Fusion 's, ERC-1's, and other items. Both Fusions broke down. Both ERC's broke down. I regret that decision daily. It locks up, the setup is not even sort of intuitive, configuring anything on it is a chore, and some basic features are left out on it.

I've heard similar processor hangup on every single Emotiva processor - I don't hear that kind of thing for other more well known brands. I may stick with Emotiva amps on the used market, but I'll never shop Emotiva direct for anything. As soon as I have the money and find something with 4K on clearance, this MC is gone.

The firmware updates were also promised but the delays were massive.

My unbiased review of ANTHEM VS NAD in terms of sound quality

I have been on this edge for well over a year now. Its hard to say one direction is best between the two. The 60 appears to be all that if you take stock in the hubbub right ups. One tester even went as far to say it sounded better than his D2. But on a realistic note, I am more interested in the DAC upgrades in the and for musical purposes compared to the A. I'm definitely looking on the used market, and I've got a ton of time to wait for the right one.

I really do appreciate all of the feedback. Everyone has pretty much talked me off of the Emotiva bandwagon and it's going to be a tough decision between the other two, but I'm leaning toward the Anthem, based on all it's features and ease of use. It did have the HDMI board replaced about 3 years ago but that has been the only issue with it ever. No need for Atmos, 4k or blablabla.

It is a fantastic sounding unit. Video processing is pretty tight as well. I am planning on buying Dirac processors for my new setup this fall. Emotiva is the only one with Dirac listed, and for me that makes it 1 feature wise.

If you decide to get one of the others


Replies to “Arcam vs anthem vs rotel”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *